Dmitry Odegov
Architecture · Backend · Agentic AI · Full-cycle Engineering
I build production systems at the intersection of backend, architecture, and AI. My foundation is backend development and enterprise-system design; today I specialize in agentic AI: multi-agent systems, RAG, tool calling, AI workflows, and the engineering infrastructure around LLMs. I take a task from business requirements and architecture through implementation, integrations, and frontend to production.
I am an engineer with a strong foundation in backend development and enterprise architecture, while also having built a number of products end-to-end — from requirements and architecture through backend, frontend, integrations, and production.
Today I specialize in production AI: agentic systems, RAG, multi-agent architectures, and AI-assisted engineering, applying the same engineering discipline I developed through backend and full-cycle product development.
I start from the task and the system constraints, not from technology.
01
Formalizing requirements, product boundaries, and constraints: what the system must do ‒ and what it must not.
02
Service boundaries, APIs, data models, and integrations. Decomposing requirements into maintainable architecture.
03
Backend, AI components, frontend, and infrastructure ‒ tools are chosen after architecture, not before it.
04
LLMs and agents get interfaces, business rules, tools, constraints, checks, and observability ‒ instead of replacing architecture.
05
Testability, observability, maintainability, and operability matter more than an impressive demo.
This approach lets me use AI to accelerate development without turning production code into a set of unpredictable decisions.
AI engineering, not vibe coding
I use AI as part of the engineering process, not as a replacement for engineering work.
In AI development I rely on my backend and architecture background: I define system rules, project structure, component interfaces, business constraints, and quality criteria up front.
For AI-assisted development I use my own engineering harness: a set of rules, architectural patterns, backend/frontend conventions, business constraints, and guardrails that help AI work inside a defined system instead of redesigning it at every step.
Business rules, conversation rules, and quality criteria are fixed before models are connected.
AI generates content and decisions inside an allowed data model; checks, billing, and side effects stay in deterministic backend code.
Call logging, scenario testing, and retrieval/answer quality evaluation are a mandatory part of every AI component.
One axis: Architecture → Backend & Fullstack → AI Engineering → Production
System design, component boundaries, APIs, data, and integrations.
Python / FastAPI, async services, APIs, business logic, PostgreSQL, queues, caching, and integrations.
Web applications and client interfaces with React/Vue, realtime features, and desktop/mobile delivery using web-based clients and platform integration tools.
Agentic AI, multi-agent systems, RAG, tool calling, MCP, orchestration, evaluation, and production LLM integration.
Docker, Linux, CI/CD, monitoring, deployment, and operations.
Engineering case studies: product, problem, my role, decisions, and outcome. The stack sits at the bottom of each card.
A production-oriented AI support system with multi-agent orchestration, RAG, business rules, and backend API integrations.
A multi-agent AI support system: dialog, corporate knowledge base, and backend tool calls governed by business rules.
A full-cycle corporate messenger built end-to-end: architecture, backend, web client, desktop clients for Windows and Linux, Android client, UI/UX, integrations, and production deployment.
End-to-end product ownership — from architecture and UI/UX to backend, client applications, integrations, and production deployment.
A full-cycle AI product for generating and visually editing landing pages: architecture, backend, frontend, UI/UX, AI integrations, deployment, and a dedicated Go-based serving layer for published pages.
End-to-end product development, from the editor interface and AI interaction to publishing and serving completed landing pages through a dedicated high-performance rendering and serving layer.
A microservice AI application for kitchen planning: architecture, backend, realtime integrations, and technical leadership of the backend team.
Architectural ownership: microservice boundaries, realtime, queues, AI models, and technical leadership of the backend team.
Full cycle: knowledge base, ingestion/ETL, embeddings, retrieval pipeline, and RAG over structured sources.
Engineering foundation: full business-process lifecycle and hybrid architecture with legacy modernization.
A REST API and customer portal for a wholesale business with data integration and a web interface.
A full-cycle AI service: experience analysis, job matching, cover letters, and a web interface.
Not a resume copy, but a career narrative: enterprise systems → backend → architecture → full-cycle → AI engineering.
2018–2023
C#/.NET → Python → Web → Go → ML
Legacy modernization, backend, APIs, business processes, architecture.
2023–2025
Python/FastAPI, microservices, infrastructure
Microservices, AI/ML products, infrastructure, and technical leadership.
2025
RAG, LLM integrations, fullstack
AI products, RAG, LLM integrations, fullstack delivery from idea to production.
2026+
Agentic AI, multi-agent systems, RAG, MCP
Production AI: agentic architectures, knowledge bases, AI engineering harness.
A senior mindset without “responsible and stress-resistant” clichés.
First I define system boundaries and component responsibilities, then I choose tools.
LLMs and agents get interfaces, constraints, tools, rules, and observability.
I never add a microservice, queue, or AI component just because the technology exists.
A system must be testable, observable, maintainable, and operable.
The stack is chosen for product constraints, not the other way around.
The stack confirms the profile instead of being the main content.